Uber Sexual Assault Lawyer

We Represent Assault Survivors in Lawsuits Against Lyft and Uber 

Rideshare users, like Uber passengers, are effectively trusting strangers to transport them safely to their intended destination.

It has become convenient for many individuals to travel to and from work or social destinations. Unfortunately, some Uber drivers take advantage of this dynamic and isolation to commit sexual assault against the Uber passenger.

Uber’s internal data supports the existence of an alarming and pervasive pattern. Survivors of sexual assault committed by Uber drivers are in the process of seeking compensation for damages like medical bills, emotional distress, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

These brave victims allege that Uber’s negligent hiring practices made them more likely to suffer harm caused by predatory rideshare drivers. We represent numerous Uber sexual assault victims who each allege the company failed to implement even simple safety measures to protect passengers.

At Dolman Law Group, our team of experienced Uber and Lyft sexual assault attorneys have been working tirelessly to support survivors in their pursuit of fair settlements and accountability.

You can reach out to us at (866) 481-5340 or through our online contact form to schedule a free consultation with a qualified Uber sexual assault lawyer. 

Uber Sexual Assault MDL Update

March 1, 2025–Recent Developments in Uber Sexual Assault MDL (March 2025)

Case Growth and New Filings

The Uber sexual assault MDL continues to expand, with 1,562 federal cases pending as of March 2025 and over 500 related cases in California state courts, bringing the total to more than 2,000 lawsuits nationwide. January 2025 saw a sharp rise in new filings, with 75 additional cases—twice the number from December.

New lawsuits highlight the ongoing influx of plaintiffs. In San Antonio, Texas, a woman sued Uber, alleging an assault by her driver on February 2, 2023. Another plaintiff in Chicago, Illinois, filed suit on February 14, 2025, claiming Uber failed to screen drivers with histories of misconduct, putting passengers at risk. These cases underscore the continued wave of survivors coming forward.

Pretrial Discovery and Case Management

On February 20, 2025, a Special Master issued Master Order No. 2 to address disputes over privileged documents. Uber must produce revised privilege logs and redacted records by deadlines, particularly before key witness depositions.

A two-track review process was implemented—early deposition privilege disputes (Feb-Mar) will be resolved post-testimony, while later depositions (Mar-Apr) will have disputes settled beforehand. If necessary, plaintiffs can challenge Uber’s privilege claims through meet-and-confers, in-camera reviews, and court appeals.

The MDL is now moving into the bellwether trial phase. Each side selected 10 cases by February 14, 2025, with case-specific discovery set to conclude by September 22, 2025. The first bellwether trial is scheduled for December 8, 2025, and its outcomes will likely influence settlement talks.

Legal Battle Over Uber’s Safety Marketing

A key dispute in the case is whether Uber’s safety-related advertising is relevant evidence. Plaintiffs argue Uber’s public safety assurances misled riders, making its marketing central to negligence claims and potential punitive damages. They have requested Uber’s internal safety communications and advertising records from 2012 to 2024.

Uber is pushing back, arguing that the court has dismissed broad fraud claims because plaintiffs failed to prove they relied on specific ads. Uber maintains that most marketing materials are irrelevant unless a plaintiff saw and relied on them.

The court has ordered Uber to produce sample safety-related communications logs, but broader discovery disputes remain unresolved. Depositions and further evidence review will likely determine the scope of admissible marketing-related materials.

These pretrial developments set the stage for critical discovery battles and upcoming bellwether trials, which could shape the litigation’s future and any potential settlements.

February 1, 2025 – Uber Sexual Assault MDL Expands to 1,487 Cases; Bellwether Trials and Legal Challenges Ahead

The multidistrict litigation (MDL) titled In re: Uber Technologies Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation (MDL No. 3084) now includes 1,487 active cases, reflecting an increase of 28 new lawsuits. U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer has established a framework for selecting bellwether trials. By February 14, 2025, both parties must each choose 10 cases, creating a pool of 20 lawsuits for case-specific discovery and trial preparation. The first bellwether trial is set to begin on December 8, 2025.

These lawsuits continue to face legal hurdles. On January 27, 2025, the Nevada Supreme Court denied Uber’s request to impose a 20% cap on contingent attorney fees in civil cases, ruling that the proposed language was “misleading and confusing.” This ruling was seen as a victory for plaintiffs, including Uber passengers who have filed sexual assault claims.

January 1, 2025 – Uber Sexual Assault Litigation and Multidistrict Case Update (MDL 3084)

As of January 2025, Uber Technologies, Inc. faces a growing number of sexual assault lawsuits, which have been consolidated into a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 3084) in the Northern District of California. Over the past few months, the volume of pending cases has risen sharply, increasing from 387 in August to 1,459 by December, signaling heightened legal challenges for the company.

The litigation process has involved intricate discovery disputes. Attorneys representing plaintiffs have requested access to confidential materials and testimonies from prior, unrelated cases involving Uber to strengthen their claims. Uber, in response, has resisted these requests, pushing for traditional discovery protocols. Despite objections, the court has allowed limited information sharing, with initial bellwether trials expected to begin in late 2025.

Uber continues to assert its commitment to passenger safety, emphasizing recent safety features and protocol enhancements. Nevertheless, the escalating number of lawsuits and the formal consolidation into multidistrict litigation highlights persistent concerns regarding passenger security and corporate accountability in the rideshare industry.

December 1, 2024 – Uber Faces Rising Sexual Assault Cases and Discovery Challenges

As of November 2024, the Uber sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of California has grown significantly, with over 1,400 claims now pending. This reflects a sharp increase from 387 cases in late 2023. Plaintiffs allege that Uber failed to adequately protect passengers from sexual assault and harassment, citing negligence in background checks and safety measures. A new lawsuit filed in November 2024 in California state court adds to the growing list of claims.

The litigation also faces heated discovery disputes. Plaintiffs are pushing to include confidential documents and testimonies from unrelated lawsuits, arguing these are crucial for a fair trial. While the court has allowed limited information sharing, Uber maintains that standard discovery rules should apply. The first trials are expected to begin next year, with outcomes likely to influence Uber’s safety policies and accountability standards.

November 1, 2024 – Court’s Pretrial Order in Uber Sexual Assault MDL Keeps Claims Alive, Examines Duty of Care and State Law Limitations

A recent pretrial order in the Uber rideshare sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL) introduces new considerations that could shape the case’s trajectory. The court examined Uber’s arguments for dismissing vicarious liability claims under California and Texas laws, where the company argued it should not be held responsible for drivers’ actions since they are classified as independent contractors.

However, the court allowed these claims to move forward, focusing on Uber’s broader duty of care, mainly through its operational and marketing practices. This approach suggests that Uber’s role in arranging rides may expand the scope of its liability.

The order also highlights limitations within Texas’s Transportation Network Company (TNC) statute, which restricts liability for companies like Uber unless plaintiffs can demonstrate gross negligence or a lapse in mandated background checks.

This statute could significantly impact future proceedings if Uber’s liability depends on showing that its background-check procedures directly contributed to the alleged incidents. As these defenses evolve, especially around duty of care and statutory restrictions, they will play a crucial role in shaping Uber’s legal strategy and the arguments presented by plaintiffs as the cases advance.

October 1, 2024 – Court Establishes New Guidelines for Depositions in Uber Sexual Assault Litigation

A recent court order in the ongoing Uber sexual assault multidistrict litigation (MDL 3084) has set forth a comprehensive deposition protocol to streamline discovery. The new rules focus on coordinating depositions between parties, including third parties like Lyft, and address logistical details such as scheduling, document production, and remote technology for virtual depositions.

The order emphasizes collaboration between the parties to avoid delays and ensures that depositions remain efficient and accessible. Furthermore, the court placed significant importance on preserving the integrity of the process, including strict rules regarding objections, document authenticity, and videoconferencing tools. These new measures promote a smoother discovery process as the litigation progresses.

September 1, 2024 – Record Number of Sexual Assault Cases Filed Against Uber: Key Discovery Orders Issued

A significant development occurred in the ongoing litigation against Uber, with 946 new cases filed. These cases are part of a broader multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving allegations of sexual assault by Uber drivers. The recent court order provides insight into the complex and ongoing discovery process as both sides prepare their cases.

Court’s Latest Order on Discovery Issues

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, under Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros, issued a key order on August 16, 2024. The order focuses on the discovery process, particularly how Uber is handling the production of data related to reported incidents of sexual assault and misconduct between 2017 and 2020.

Data Production Concerns:
Plaintiffs have raised concerns about Uber’s approach to providing data. Uber initially attempted to produce the information in PDF format, which the court found inadequate. The judge highlighted that data related to sexual assault incidents is likely stored in more accessible databases like JIRA, Bliss, and Zendesk. These formats allow for more accessible analysis, which is crucial for understanding the scope and nature of the incidents. The court is pushing for Uber to produce the data in its original database format rather than in PDFs, which are less functional for detailed analysis.

Third-Party Discovery from Lyft:
The court also addressed issues related to third-party discovery involving Lyft. Previously, Lyft was ordered to produce documents concerning the Industry Sharing Safety Program (ISSP), which includes communications between Lyft and Uber. Lyft raised objections, leading the court to halt further production until these issues are resolved temporarily. Plaintiffs must now review their discovery requests to ensure they are not overly burdensome and to focus on obtaining necessary information through Uber’s productions whenever possible.

Subpoena Disputes:
The court laid a clear plan for resolving disputes over subpoenas served on non-parties such as Ballard Partners, Nexar, and The Chertoff Group. If negotiations with these entities do not resolve the issues, the plaintiffs must file motions to enforce the subpoenas by the end of August 2024. The court emphasizes efficiency, requiring all filings to be concise and detailed, specifying which documents have already been produced and whether they cover the requested information.

Upcoming Discovery Status Conference:
To ensure ongoing progress in the case, the court scheduled a Discovery Status Conference for August 30, 2024. Both parties must submit a detailed status report by August 28, 2024, outlining their progress and any remaining issues.

This order reflects the court’s commitment to ensuring that the discovery process is conducted fairly and efficiently as the number of cases against Uber grows. With nearly a thousand cases filed in August alone, the stakes are high, and the discovery process is critical in moving these cases forward.

August 1, 2024 – Uber Ordered to Provide Driver Safety Reports

The MDL judge has ordered Uber to disclose safety report data in response to allegations that its drivers are committing sexual assaults against passengers. This evidence may help support the plaintiffs’ claims that Uber knew about driver sexual misconduct involving passengers but allowed drivers to keep working.

There are currently 321 pending complaints in this MDL, most alleging Uber failed to adequately protect passengers from sexual assault or harassment by Uber drivers. As the litigation grows, the requested safety information could prove vital to injured plaintiffs receiving the compensation they deserve.

July 2, 2024 – MDL No. 3084 is Creating More Interest as More People Come Forward

The multidistrict litigation (MDL) against Uber and Lyft, now under the supervision of Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California, has grown to encompass more than 321 cases.

These lawsuits continue to progress because of allegations that both ride-sharing companies fell short in protecting passengers, particularly regarding implementing adequate safety protocols and conducting thorough driver background checks. These alleged shortcomings, plaintiffs argue, led to numerous instances of sexual assault by drivers.

By consolidating these cases into an MDL, the court system aims to enhance efficiency in the legal process. This approach allows for streamlined pretrial procedures and promotes consistency in judicial decisions across similar cases.

As the litigation progresses, it continues to draw attention to the broader issues of passenger safety and corporate responsibility in the ride-sharing industry.

June 3, 2024 – Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits Filed in May

A Boston woman filed a sexual assault lawsuit against Uber at the start of May. She claims the Uber sexually assaulted her in his vehicle. Once this case is transferred to federal court, it will likely be added to the pending MDL.

Then, at the end of May, a California woman filed a lawsuit against Uber, claiming she was assaulted by an Uber driver when the driver brought her to a medical facility for an appointment but then sexually assaulted her in the back seat.

As more sexual assault cases come to light, we are seeing a severe and ongoing pattern of rideshare app users suffering from physical and emotional damage. Uber continues to fight these claims. If you or someone you love is an Uber assault survivor, contact the personal injury lawyers at Dolman Law Group to learn more about your legal rights.

May 27, 2024 – CMC Focuses on Discovery Issues and MDL Progress

All parties recently attended a case management conference (CMC) involving the 297 federal lawsuits and 395 cases filed in the California Judicial Council Coordinated Proceedings (JCCP). The court reviewed the current status of these cases and discussed discovery and motion practice coordination.

Uber proposed a filing deadline linked to its argument claiming inconvenient forum locations. Plaintiffs oppose any deadline, claiming it would harm these plaintiffs and cause further trauma.

Not surprisingly, the parties cannot agree on the discovery procedures. Uber has offered redacted documents and has raised privilege concerns to prevent more extensive disclosure. At this point, the court only requires each plaintiff to disclose their rideshare information and the information needed for the Plaintiff Fact Sheets.

May 22, 2024 – Uber Claims Case Consolidation is Not Permitted; Court Rejects Argument, MDL Will Stand

Uber tried to argue that its app’s “Terms of Use” provisions do not allow injured rideshare users to consolidate legal claims through a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL).

The court held that Uber’s language prohibiting coordinated legal actions must be unenforceable. Enforcing this type of language undermines the critical benefits of the MDL and the court’s ability to manage this litigation. Uber’s terms directly conflicted with Congress’s goals when it created MDLs to protect the public by consolidating similar cases for discovery and pre-trial procedures.

This legal decision was a crucial turning point in the Uber sexual assault MDL. If the court had enforced Uber’s app language, the MDL would have been dismissed.

May 2, 2024 – Electronic Discovery Methods in Dispute, MDL Adds 12 More Cases

In lawsuits involving app-based companies, such as Uber and Lyft, most documentary evidence is in electronic form (ESI – Electronically Stored Information) rather than paper format. This can create discovery headaches since plaintiffs need to see all versions of inter-corporate and external memos, letters, and other records.

The plaintiffs in the Uber assault cases have requested all versions of relevant communications, including documents linked to emails, to show what the company knew and when. Uber is resisting these demands by claiming the process will be too burdensome.

Plaintiffs have suggested a technological way to automate the discovery process, but Uber claims it’s not feasible. Instead, Uber has proposed a manual process limiting its disclosure obligations to only documents specifically requested as long as the process doesn’t require too much effort.

While this may seem like the parties are arguing about tiny details, the plaintiffs’ cases may hinge on proving what Uber knew, who knew certain things, and when everyone became aware that Uber drivers were assaulting passengers.

Twelve new lawsuits joined this MDL in April, so there are now 252 rideshare sexual assault claims pending in this multidistrict litigation. If you are considering filing a sexual assault claim against Uber or Lyft, reach out to the experienced mass tort legal team at Dolman Law Group today.

April 10, 2024 – Uber Faces Shareholder Lawsuit, Tries to Avoid Liability in Texas. Judge Rules Uber Must Disclose All Government Investigation Documents and Fact Sheets are Required From Both Sides

Uber’s shareholders have filed a federal lawsuit against the company, alleging its leadership used advertising and public filings to misrepresent the company’s safety despite knowing about more than 9,000 reports of sexual assault by drivers. The CEO and former CFO are defendants because they allegedly raked in millions of dollars through insider trading and compensation while this occurred.

With 43 cases filed in 2024, the total number of pending lawsuits in this Uber sexual assault MDL is now 230. However, Uber is trying to dismiss all claims based in Texas by arguing Texas law will not hold the company responsible for its drivers’ actions. We certainly hope the court will not agree with this position.

The government has also been investigating allegations about Uber driver sexual misconduct. The MDL judge is now requiring Uber to disclose all related documents. Finally, both sides of this MDL are now required to file fact sheets to help the court determine similar issues, manage discovery, and select bellwether cases to act as test trials in the future.

March 4, 2024 – Lyft Rideshare Company Tries to Avoid Responsibility for Minor’s Assault

The parents of a 14-year-old girl filed a lawsuit in Connecticut against rideshare company Lyft (one of Uber’s largest competitors). Lyft filed a motion to dismiss the case, claiming it was not responsible for its driver’s actions. In that case, the minor, who was wearing pajamas and carrying a backpack when she entered the vehicle, was taken across state lines and allegedly sexually abused. The complaint alleges Lyft was negligent because the driver never confirmed the girl’s age before the ride and violated Lyft’s driver policy prohibiting driving a minor alone.

Lyft claimed it could not be held responsible for the driver’s actions. The court disagreed. The parents were allowed to amend the complaint with additional claims based on vicarious liability and negligent infliction of emotional distress. They also dropped a count based on negligent supervision. The judge specifically pointed to the Lyft policy regarding solo minor riders, which showed the company had considered this scenario and the potential for harm.

Even though this is not an Uber case, we know some judges will not allow these nationwide rideshare companies to avoid responsibility by blaming their drivers.

February 17, 2024 – Master Complaint Helps Plaintiffs Join Uber MDL

Judge Gergel approved a master complaint form to help new plaintiffs join the MDL. This document includes allegations and demands for all future plaintiffs’ complaints. Notably, the master complaint states that even though Uber knew its drivers had been sexually assaulting passengers since 2014, it placed company profit and expansion above passenger safety.

The complaint also states that Uber could have implemented additional safety measures like cameras in the vehicles, biometric checks, and better driver background screenings to protect app users. It also alleges that Uber allowed drivers to continue working even after learning they had sexual misconduct issues. Finally, the complaint demands financial compensation for injured plaintiffs and punitive damages against Uber.

January 27, 2024 – Plaintiffs Oppose Deadline for Novel Filings

The plaintiffs in the Uber sexual assault MDL filed a motion opposing Uber’s attempt to limit the number of novel claims seeking entrance to the legal proceedings. The rideshare company’s request is part of its broader campaign to get the MDL dismantled, which recently solicited the intervention of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Gergel has scheduled a hearing in which to address the contentious disagreement this Friday.

January 10, 2024 – California State Supreme Court Asked to Resolve ‘Duty of Care’ Question in Pivotal Sexual Assault Lawsuit

The Ninth Circuit has referred a thorny legal dispute to the Supreme Court of the state of California. The issue pertains to a lawsuit in which a woman claims she was sexually assaulted by an individual who impersonated an Uber driver. The rideshare company contends that it did not owe the passenger a duty of care under the circumstances and asserts that it cannot be held liable for her injuries. 

The outcome of the ruling is likely to have a direct impact on the liability dispute that parties in the ongoing MDL have conducted for months. 

January 4, 2024 – Appeals Court Agrees to Assess the Merits of Uber MDL

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Uber’s request to assess the merits of the sexual assault multidistrict litigation in late December. Shortly thereafter, Uber filed a motion with the transferee court in which it seeks a 60-day hiatus for all pretrial proceedings.

Judge Breyer has not issued a response to Uber’s motion, nor has the prosecution filed briefs with the Ninth Circuit or the U.S District Court for the Northern District of California. For the time being, the legal proceedings are at a standstill.

We have seen an additional two dozen lawsuits filed into the Uber rideshare sexual assault MDL. As this lawsuit generates more attention, many individuals who suffered sexual assault are coming forward to ensure this company is held accountable for placing their profit margins over simple safety measures that would have protected passengers. We believe that Uber will inevitably be held responsible for the numerous reported incidents that have come to light. 

We are also seeing several new lawsuits alleging Lyft failed to protect their passengers as well. Although Lyft sexual abuse claims are not part of this MDL, we anticipate lawsuits against that rideshare company will also be consolidated into its own multidistrict litigation.

December 26, 2023 – Texas Woman Files Lawsuit Against Uber, Accuses Rape

A Texas woman filed a lawsuit against Uber on December 14, alleging that her driver raped her in September 2017. The complaint, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accuses Uber of neglecting basic safety measures to protect passengers. Among other complaints, the lawsuit filing stated that “While Uber has, in recent years, publicly acknowledged this sexual assault crisis—including through the publication of Uber’s U.S. Safety Report in December 2019—Uber has failed to implement basic safety measures necessary to prevent these serious physical and/or sexual assaults, which continue to occur to this day.” The case adds to federal MDL lawsuits alleging Uber’s failure to implement adequate safety protocols to prevent such assaults.

December 16, 2023 – Judge Breyer Appoints Leadership In Uber Rideshare Sexual Assault MDL

Justice Breyer has appointed three women to serve as co-lead counsel to head up the Uber sexual assault MDL, along with eleven lawyers to serve in leadership. As of date, 153 lawsuits have been filed naming Uber as a defendant with similar claims. All lawsuits contain common allegations Uber deviated from their duty to safeguard passengers by failing to conduct thorough background checks of drivers, which would have prevented sexual predators from for the app. Further, many lawsuits allege Uber failed to properly train drivers in the context of sexual abuse and refused to provide cameras inside the vehicle. 

In his pretrial order, Judge Breyer ordered the plaintiff and defense counsel to confer and submit proposals for a pretrial discovery plan and a schedule to brief the forthcoming motion to dismiss. 

December 15, 2023 – Horrific Sexual Assault by Lyft Driver is a National Story

Although Lyft sexual assaults are not included in this MDL, we anticipate all Federal lawsuits will inevitably be consolidated into their own multidistrict litigation. We also represent survivors of sexual assaults in a Lyft. A recent story broke of a women who fell asleep in a rideshare vehicle and was raped by her Lyft driver. 

December 12, 2023 – Judges Deny Uber’s Request to Rename Multidistrict Litigation

Representatives for Uber requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) change the name of their case from “In re Uber Technologies Inc Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation” to “In re Uber Rideshare Litigation”. They argued that the plaintiffs have yet to prove that they experienced sexual assault perpetrated by an Uber driver, but by including the term in the name of the MDL, it insinuates that the plaintiffs’ accusations are already fact. 

Uber’s representatives believe that allowing the term “sexual assault” to remain would constitute an unfair bias and prematurely imply that the rideshare company was liable for the plaintiffs’ damages. Attorneys for Uber also cited a recent instance from 2018 where the JPML updated the name of a case, where plaintiffs alleged General Motors had sold them vehicles with defective air conditioning units, to a less controversial title as a precedent for their current argument. 

They noted that a panel of judges in California, where the Uber sexual assault MDL has been transferred, has approved removing references to sexual assault from the names of the rideshare claims. Ultimately, the JPML rejected the name change bid on December 12th, 2023, reasoning that the original version, including the reference to sexual assault allegations, was appropriate for the sake of clarity and in line with past naming conventions.

October 10, 2023 – JPML Consolidates Uber Rideshare Sexual Assault Lawsuits

The Joint Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) ordered the transfer of 44 (forty-four) sexual assault lawyers to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Francisco) in the creation of an Uber Rideshare MDL (Multidistrict Litigation). Judge Charles Breyer will preside over all sexual misconduct lawsuits.

Why You Should Trust Dolman Law Group to Negotiate Your Uber Sexual Assault Claim or Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit

Dolman Law Group has proudly advocated for clients who have been wrongfully harmed due to another party’s negligence, including sexual assault survivors. 

We have handled over 400 individual sexual assault claims to date, constituting a wide array of sex offenses.

Matthew Dolman represented a minor sexually assaulted at a summer camp, resulting in a $2.25 million settlement in 2023

He also represented multiple victims of sexual abuse at a juvenile detention center that resulted in an eight-figure confidential settlement.

As accomplished personal injury lawyers, we know the value of providing each case with individualized attention. You can expect us to be thorough, communicative, and compassionate throughout the entire process.

Our sexual assault lawyers at Dolman Law Group strive to leverage existing resources, experience dealing with insurance companies, investigative skills, and legal wisdom to negotiate maximum compensation for our injured clients. Further, it is our willingness to take cases to trial and through verdict that levels the playing field for clients who square off against powerful corporations.

We have the combination of expertise needed to deal with all aspects of Uber or Lyft sexual assault cases. Rideshare sexual assault claims require a thorough understanding of state laws governing liability for companies like Uber and Lyft. The rideshare accident lawyers of Dolman Law Group regularly negotiate claims involving Lyft and Uber, which has allowed us to develop an extensive knowledge of rideshare insurance policies and applicable state laws. 

Not only do we understand the intricacies of rideshare accident liability, but we have dealt with sexual assault claims in many different contexts, including survivors who experienced sexual assault in the military, at the workplace, and in their own church. This has given us valuable experience in collecting evidence, navigating legal standards for sexual assault, and cultivating trust with sexual assault survivors.

Our credibility with survivors is based on the results we achieve, as well as the level of respect and sensitivity we exhibit towards them. It is important to note, that both Uber and Lyft rideshare apps have emergency services options built into their platform.  Over the past three years, there has been growing media attention focused on reports of rape and violent crimes by users of the rideshare app.  While Uber has received the most attention, there is increased attention on Lyft driver sexual assaults.  

Understanding What Qualifies as Sexual Assault

Sexual assault is when one person forces unwanted sexual contact upon another person. This act can involve people of any gender, ethnicity, or socio-economic status, though in the case of Uber assault, it is more commonly a male driver attacking a female passenger.

In Uber or Lyft sexual assault lawsuits, there have also been accusations of kidnapping and physical violence related to the sexual assault. The key is that the injured party did not agree to engage in sexual activity or was unable to consent to the contact due to intoxication, age, or impairment. 

This is distinguished from sexual abuse or sexual harassment. Sexual abuse is typically used to describe a repeated pattern of non-consensual sexual contact, usually involving a person who is known to the injured party. These acts can range from non-consensual touching or kissing to non-consensual sexual penetration.  Keep in mind that touching or attempting to touch a sexual or non-sexual body part constitutes assault.

In most cases, sexual abuse applies to situations involving children or other vulnerable people, as they are more likely to be in long-term situations where they cannot escape from their abuser. The primary difference between abuse and assault is that the term sexual assault refers to a single event.

Sexual harassment can often be a precursor to sexual assault. Harassment is seen as a lesser offense and more often involves civil penalties rather than criminal. If an Uber driver requested a sexual favor, made crass comments about your body, or solicited sexually explicit pictures, that would likely be considered sexual harassment. Other acts, like exposing genitals to a non-consenting party, can fall into a gray area between harassment and assault.

Examples of sexual assault can include:

• Groping over or under clothing
• Non-consensual kissing
• Touching breasts, genitals, or buttocks
• Non-consensual sexual penetration with digits or an object
• Rape or attempted rape
• Forced sexual acts, such as oral sex

How Rideshare Sexual Assault Occurs – Uber & Lyft Sexual Assault Lawyers

Rideshare users are inherently vulnerable when they accept a ride from an Uber driver. As a rider, you are in an enclosed space with a stranger who has control of the car and, therefore, your safety. Other circumstances can put you at a further disadvantage, such as traveling in an unfamiliar area, under the influence of alcohol, at a late hour, or riding by yourself. Uber drivers with malicious intentions may attempt to exploit this opportunity to perpetrate a sexual assault. 

There are several methods an Uber or Lyft driver may employ to commit sexual assault against a passenger. Sexual assault can be inflicted through sheer physical force, coercion, or manipulation. Physical force involves overpowering the passenger with size or strength. Impaired passengers may lack the coordination to fight off a rideshare driver, placing them at a greater risk of sexual assault. This is especially upsetting, considering that Uber and Lyft drivers are heralded as an alternative to drunk driving.

An Uber driver who intends to assault a passenger sexually may also use threats to intimidate their passenger into compliance, such as the prospect of violence. Refusing to take a passenger home, plying them with alcohol or drugs, pressuring them after being rejected, and threatening a passenger’s family or friends can all be tactics used to enable sexual assault. A perpetrator may encourage feelings of shame, fear, or doubt to discourage the survivor from reporting the attack.

Injuries Associated With Sexual Assaults Perpetrated by Uber Drivers

For survivors to secure compensation for their damages in a personal injury lawsuit, they have to be able to tie their losses to an injury they experienced as a result of Uber’s negligence. Injuries acquired during a sexual assault can range from minor cuts that heal on their own to debilitating brain injuries that require surgical intervention. However, severe injuries are relatively rare in sexual assault cases. 

It is important to note that sexual assault is not always accompanied by visible physical trauma. Research published in the National Women’s Study found that 70% of sexual assault survivors were not physically injured during the rape. While physical injuries can be used as evidence of the assault, their absence should not be used to dismiss a survivor’s account of sexual and physical assault.

In addition to the physical component of a sexual assault, most survivors experience long-term mental trauma. This can manifest as flashbacks to the experience, nightmares, insomnia, paranoia about personal safety, self-harm, social isolation, and irritability. Mental injuries can also have physical consequences for sexual assault victims, such as rapid weight loss, recurring pain, and fatigue. The most common types of injuries and health consequences linked to sexual assault include:

• Bruising around the wrists, inner thighs, or genitals
• Internal damage, such as tears and bruising, to the vagina or anus
• Scratches 
• Trauma to the face
• Broken bones
• Unintended pregnancy
• Sexually Transmitted Diseases
• PSTD
• Depression
• Anxiety

(Keep in mind that a rape kit is not always readily available. However, medical records can provide essential evidence.)

Damages Available in an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit

Enduring a sexual assault is a destabilizing experience for many survivors. The effects of trauma can bleed into other areas of your life, including your career, relationships, and finances. For example, a survivor of an Uber driver may develop severe depression that causes them to underperform at work and need to see a therapist weekly. The emotional toll of the sexual assault, the cost of a career setback, and the expense of therapy can all potentially be considered damages in an Uber or Lyft sexual assault lawsuit.

While the trauma of such a violating experience cannot be undone, securing compensation in a personal injury lawsuit can help restore some level of what was taken. Economic damages recognize financial losses the plaintiff has sustained, and non-economic damages provide compensation for the intangible costs that resulted from the plaintiff’s sexual assault injury.  Examples of damages in an Uber sexual assault lawsuit include:

• Medical bills
• Pain and suffering
• Emotional distress
• Mental anguish
• Lost wages
• Loss of quality of life

Understanding Passenger Liability in an Uber Sexual Assault Claim

In a personal injury lawsuit involving a rideshare company, liability is often complicated because Uber drivers are technically designated as independent contractors (IC) under the law. That means that Uber has less legal culpability for their actions if they harm someone else because they are not considered employees. For example, in an Uber rideshare car accident, the level of coverage offered by Uber depends on whether the driver was actively picking up or transporting a passenger, awaiting a ride request, or using their car in a personal capacity. 

However, Uber and other rideshare companies are not completely absolved of any duty of care to passengers just because their drivers are ICs. In effect, that means Uber could be held liable for a passenger’s damages if the company’s negligence is responsible for their injuries. Uber is currently facing dozens of claims alleging that they failed to properly screen their drivers or to respond to allegations of sexual assault. 

These actions are not only within their purview but are also part of their legal obligation to passengers to take appropriate steps to reduce their risk of injury. Hence the importance of retaining a lawyer experienced in representing victims of Uber or Lyft sexual assaults. Numerous women have filed lawsuits against Uber and Lyft alleging the rideshare companies 

If plaintiffs can offer evidence that Uber had hired someone with a recent record of sexual assault incidents, or failed to fire someone with multiple complaints of sexual harassment against them, for example, that could be used to establish that Uber reasonably should have known that the driver presented a threat to passengers.

Plaintiffs may then argue that their failure to vet drivers and failure to remove problematic drivers cautiously is a breach of their duty of care, which created the circumstances for the sexual assault to occur. Whether or not courts find this narrative compelling remains to be seen.

Dozens of Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits Have Been Consolidated

Plaintiffs in Uber or Lyft sexual assault claims say that Uber’s safety practices fall short in terms of protecting passengers from being sexually assaulted. Some have pushed for additional screening measures, like incorporating fingerprinting into Uber’s background check protocols and extra ride security in the form of a dashcam. In the meantime, survivors hope to secure fair compensation for their damages.

As of October 2023, about 80 Uber sexual assault claims have been successfully consolidated against the rideshare company, although in total, hundreds of Uber or Lyft sexual assault claims have been filed. Judge Charles Breyer in the Northern District of California will oversee the pretrial process. This consolidation is a significant milestone for survivors, as Uber’s terms of use policy has previously precluded class action lawsuits.

Consolidating the claims can benefit plaintiffs by creating more consistent rulings on issues like what evidence is allowed. This allows them to advocate as a group instead of individuals and share resources like expert witnesses. Plaintiffs still hold the burden of proof for establishing Uber’s liability, drawing a connection between their injuries and the damages they are claiming, and demonstrating the monetary value of their damages.

What You Should Do If An Uber Driver Sexually Assaulted You

The first thing to do is to get yourself to safety. Aim for a well-lit, busy area if possible. From there, you should seek out medical attention. Even if your physical injuries are minor, it is important to create a third-party record that verifies the severity of your injuries, shows that you received treatment, and connects the injuries to the assault. 

Otherwise, representatives for the defendant may argue that you exaggerated your injuries or postponed treatment so your injuries would worsen to benefit your claim. In addition to seeking immediate medical attention, document everything that you can and try to make notes about what happened. This includes taking pictures or video of your injuries and the driver’s behavior, taking a screenshot of the driver’s profile, creating a timeline of events, and recording your route. 

You may also want to consider filing a report with law enforcement, as they can conduct further investigations and help preserve critical evidence that can be used to bring criminal charges or pursue a civil claim, depending on the circumstances. If you are interested in exploring your legal options for compensation in a civil claim, you should contact a personal injury attorney who has experience handling both rideshare claims and sexual assault lawsuits. 

How an Uber Sexual Assault Lawyer Can Help You

It takes a highly experienced personal injury attorney to navigate claims involving sexual assault successfully. Survivors may be understandably reticent to undergo invasive exams or provide detailed testimony since physical evidence must be acquired quickly, eyewitness testimony may be problematic to come by, and, given all that, the evidentiary standard can be an obstacle. The involvement of a third party further complicates Uber’s sexual assault claims.

The average client does not possess the investigative resources, legal expertise, or schedule availability to compile evidence into a clear, persuasive argument for compensation. Personal injury lawyers are equipped to handle these aspects of your Uber sexual assault case and negotiate a fair settlement. Clients who attempt to represent themselves in complex personal injury lawsuits are often disappointed with the outcome of their settlement.

By hiring an Uber sexual assault lawyer, you are engaging the most qualified person to accurately and reliably advocate for your best interest. They will be able to manage paperwork, interpret legal jargon, coordinate communication between parties, assess the value of your damages, and champion your claim in settlement negotiations.  Additionally, representatives for the defendants are more likely to view your case as legitimate if a personal injury attorney has agreed to represent you, which can work to your benefit in negotiations. Evidence of a crime, such as a police report, will be helpful.

Dolman Law Group Has a History of Exceptional Results

As sexual abuse attorneys, we have been successful in securing settlements for clients who have been unfairly burdened with the consequences of someone else’s negligent behavior. Over the past decade, we have built a niche practice within our law firm, representing victims of sexual abuse in civil lawsuits against the perpetrator and parties responsible for such horrific and negligent conduct. We are committed to delivering superior results, especially in these cases, because we understand that this may be the only form of justice or acknowledgment they receive.

As our former clients will tell you, we possess the right combination of sensitivity and determination needed to help sexual violence survivors navigate what can be a stressful process and obtain maximum compensation for their damages. We understand that trust is earned, so our team of skilled Uber sexual assault lawyers and Lyft sexual assault attorneys will remain dedicated to negotiating your claim to achieve the best possible result. Our firm offers a free and confidential consultation to all sexual abuse victims.

Contact Dolman Law Group For Help With Your Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit

Rideshare services like Lyft and Uber were intended to provide passengers with a private, safe way to travel. However, numerous and ongoing reports of sexual assault committed by Uber drivers have demonstrated that the company has repeatedly failed to protect passengers by conducting thorough background checks and dismissing dangerous drivers. Plaintiffs in the Uber sexual assault lawsuits argue that this leaves the company liable. 

Our award-winning team of personal injury attorneys is working closely with Uber passengers who have experienced sexual assault to help them recover financial compensation for damages such as pain and suffering, medical bills, lost wages, and loss of quality of life. At Dolman Law Group, we take great pride in providing comprehensive legal services to survivors of sexual assault to maximize their compensation.

We will unapologetically advocate for your needs as your Uber sexual assault attorneys, even if that entails taking your claim to trial to obtain the compensation that you deserve. Our dependable team is available to schedule a free consultation when you reach out to us at (866) 481-5340 or fill out our online contact form. The personal injury attorneys of Dolman Law Group are prepared to offer you the legal support you need to settle your claim so that you can focus on recovering.

Our compassionate team of sexual assault attorneys will tirelessly work to pursue compensation and maximize your financial recovery. We have filed many recent lawsuits on behalf of sexual abuse survivors throughout the U.S.

Sexual abuse lawsuits are much different than your ordinary personal injury case, and it is essential to retain a law firm experienced in holding wrongdoers accountable for the harm they have caused.

We offer a free case review and confidential consultation on your potential legal action.

Frequently Asked Questions About Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits