It takes immense courage to reflect on the painful experiences of sexual abuse, especially when it occurred within a religious community that should be trusted, like the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, also known as the Church of LDS or Mormon Church. For many, the belief that the institution not only failed to protect them but also actively worked to conceal the abuse—often taking strategic actions to protect and preserve the church’s reputation at the expense of transparency and accountability—compounds the trauma.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has faced controversies ranging from its historical foundations to modern financial management and social policies.
We are exploring the patterns of abuse and cover-up in the LDS Church, as alleged by lawsuits across the country, to provide a clearer understanding of a systemic problem. In the most basic terms, the Mormon Church is currently being accused of harming innocent people or allowing sexual abuse to occur, and taking steps to protect its own reputation instead of helping the abuse survivors. In California alone, nearly 100 lawsuits have been filed against the LDS Church, alleging decades of sexual abuse and systemic cover-up, with these cases being coordinated through a Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding to facilitate pretrial discovery.
The Dolman Law Group is among the leading firms litigating LDS Church sexual abuse claims nationwide.
Introduction to the Church of Jesus Christ
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, often referred to as the LDS Church or the Mormon Church, is a prominent religious institution headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. Founded in 1830 by Joseph Smith, the church has grown into a global faith community with more than 15 million members. The teachings of Jesus Christ and a strong emphasis on family, service, and moral living are central to the beliefs of Latter-day Saints.
Despite its positive influence on millions, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has faced serious scrutiny in recent years due to allegations of child sexual abuse and sexual abuse within its ranks. These allegations have raised difficult questions about how the LDS Church and its leaders have responded to reports of abuse, and whether enough has been done to protect vulnerable members and uphold the values of Christ of Latter-day teachings. As with other large religious organizations, the challenge of addressing sexual abuse claims and ensuring accountability remains a critical issue for the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Key Takeaways About LDS Sex Abuse Lawsuits
- Recent lawsuits allege the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) fostered a culture of silence that concealed sexual abuse to protect its reputation.
- Allegations claim the church used an internal helpline and transferred accused individuals to new congregations, which may have put more people at risk.
- Many states have enacted look-back laws that extend or eliminate the statute of limitations for filing civil lawsuits, allowing survivors to file claims regardless of when the abuse occurred.
- These expanded legal windows have led to a significant increase in LDS sexual abuse lawsuits, as more survivors are able to come forward and pursue legal action.
- Filing a lawsuit allows survivors seeking justice to demand institutional accountability and seek compensation for therapy, lost wages, and other damages related to the abuse.
- California’s Child Victims Act and Maryland’s new 2023 law have led to hundreds of lawsuits against the LDS Church by eliminating or extending the statute of limitations for survivors of child sexual abuse claims to take legal action.
How the LDS Church Allegedly Cultivated a Culture of Silence
For decades, many survivors and their families were reportedly encouraged to deal with clergy abuse privately within the church community, without involving law enforcement. Survivors allege this culture of silence was a key component of a broader strategy to protect the church’s reputation and avoid scandal, especially in cases involving sexual abuse allegations. The church has been criticized for its handling of sexual abuse allegations, with claims that it prioritized institutional reputation over victim safety.
The church is accused of encouraging:
- Internal Resolution: Lawsuits allege that instead of reporting abuse to civil authorities, local church leaders were instructed to handle matters internally, often encouraging clergy forgiveness and confidentiality. This approach, while perhaps well-intentioned in some cases, effectively shielded abusers from legal consequences and prevented the abuse from being publicly known.
- Shame and Guilt: Abuse survivors, especially those who were children at the time, were often made to feel shame or guilt about the abuse, further discouraging them from speaking out. This emotional burden, combined with the power dynamics of the church hierarchy, created a formidable barrier to justice.
- Fear of Consequences: Survivors were sometimes led to believe that reporting abuse would bring shame upon their family or the church, potentially leading to social ostracism or other negative consequences. This instilled a deep-seated fear of speaking out. During the 1980s–1990s, church leaders failed to report abuse to authorities, often prioritizing institutional reputation and internal discipline over transparency and accountability.
Additionally, allegations have surfaced that the LDS Church’s helpline discouraged victims from reporting abuse to law enforcement, allowing known abusers to remain free and unaccountable and undermining efforts to report abuse to the proper authorities.
How the LDS Church Allegedly Handled Abuse
Lawsuits filed against the LDS Church across the country have painted a troubling picture of how allegations of sexual abuse were handled. The claims point to systemic policies and practices that prioritized the institution’s image over the safety of its members, with church lawyers often playing a key role in managing abuse cases to protect the church’s reputation.
The Controversial “Helpline” and Internal Policy
A central point of contention has been the church’s handling of abuse reports through its internal helpline. While the church states the helpline is a resource to provide guidance and ensure proper reporting, critics allege its true purpose is to manage the church’s legal risk.
- Legal Guidance, Not Law Enforcement: Reports indicate that calls to the helpline are often routed to the church’s legal counsel, not directly to law enforcement. Calls to the helpline may be protected by clergy privilege or clergy penitent privilege, legal doctrines that can prevent information disclosed during confession or counseling from being shared with authorities. Critics argue this allows the church to control the flow of information and potentially shield itself from liability by preventing or delaying external reporting.
- Confidentiality over Transparency: Survivors and their families who used the helpline often did so with the expectation of a confidential, pastoral conversation. However, the information they provided was reportedly used by the church’s legal team to assess its potential liability, raising questions about the true purpose and integrity of the process. Critics further argue that the LDS Church’s helpline functions as a ‘risk management playbook’ designed to insulate the Church from liability and public scrutiny, rather than serving as a genuine resource for abuse survivors.
The Alleged “Paper Trail” of Transfers
Another disturbing pattern that has emerged in lawsuits is the allegation that the church’s internal records show a history of transferring abusers to new congregations or leadership positions without warning new communities of the person’s past.
- Moving the Abuser: Lawsuits claim that when an abuse allegation was reported, instead of removing the abuser from a position of trust or reporting them to the police or local law enforcement, the church sometimes moved them to a new ward or stake. This allegedly allowed the abuser to continue having access to vulnerable individuals, including LDS church members, potentially leading to more victims. The failure to involve local law enforcement often resulted in a lack of accountability and further risk to the community.
- Lack of Public Disclosure: Because the church reportedly handled these issues internally, there was no public record of the abuse. This meant that the new LDS communities where the abuser was transferred were completely unaware of the threat, leaving new generations of children and church members exposed to harm.
Abuse Survivors and Their Stories
The voices of survivors are at the heart of the movement for change within the LDS Church. Many individuals who experienced child sexual abuse or sexual abuse connected to the Mormon Church have bravely come forward, sharing their stories despite immense personal risk. These survivors often describe being abused by church leaders, trusted members, or individuals in positions of authority, sometimes during their most vulnerable years of childhood. For years, many felt silenced by fear, shame, or pressure from church officials to keep abuse allegations private. Some survivors recount being discouraged from reporting abuse to law enforcement, while others say their claims were dismissed or minimized to protect the reputation of the Mormon Church.
The courage of these survivors has led to a wave of Mormon church sexual abuse lawsuits and public calls for accountability. Many have filed civil lawsuits against the LDS Church, seeking not only financial compensation but also acknowledgment of the harm they endured and meaningful changes to prevent future abuse. Their stories have shed light on the systemic challenges faced by those who experienced childhood sexual abuse within the church, and have prompted broader conversations about the responsibilities of church leaders and officials in responding to abuse allegations. By sharing their experiences, survivors are helping to break the silence and drive much-needed reform within the LDS Church and other religious institutions.
Finding Your Voice: The Path to Justice
For adult survivors who have experienced sexual abuse, the path to healing is often a long and difficult one. Many have suppressed their memories for years, only to have them resurface later in life. The trauma, shame, and fear that once silenced them can be overwhelming. Yet, a growing number of survivors are finding the courage to speak out and hold the institution accountable.
In the context of Mormonism, the legal deadline that all states impose to file a lawsuit (the statute of limitations) was a major barrier for adult survivors.
However, a significant number of states have now passed “look-back” laws, which temporarily or permanently suspend or extend the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse claims, regardless of when the abuse happened.
These longer filing deadlines have provided a critical window of opportunity for countless survivors to finally file a claim and seek justice for the harm they endured decades ago.
Look-back laws allow survivors to pursue legal action even if the sexual abuse occurred many years in the past. Look-back laws are a testament to the power of survivors’ voices and the legal system’s growing recognition of the lasting impact of childhood trauma and sexual abuse.
Legal claims are being brought forward as survivors seek justice and recognition for the harm they endured. Mormon sexual abuse lawsuits are being filed to address the misconduct and negligence of the institution, with survivors relying on evidence and legal support to strengthen their cases.
Legal advocates play a crucial role in helping survivors navigate the complex legal process, understand their rights, and pursue justice.
The Power of “Look-Back” Laws
For many years, the statute of limitations, which is the legal deadline all states impose to file a lawsuit, was a major barrier for adult survivors. However, a significant number of states have now passed “look-back” laws, which temporarily or permanently suspend or extend the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse claims.
These longer filing deadlines have provided a critical window of opportunity for countless survivors to finally file a claim and seek justice for the harm they endured decades ago. Look-back laws are a testament to the power of survivors’ voices and the legal system’s growing recognition of the lasting impact of childhood trauma.
The Fight for Accountability and Compensation from the Mormon Church
The legal cases being brought against the LDS Church, often referred to as an LDS church lawsuit, are not just about financial compensation; they are about demanding accountability and forcing systemic change. Survivors are seeking to hold the institution responsible for its alleged culture of silence and practices that enabled abuse for far too long, with legal action aiming to make the lds church accountable for its actions.
Of course, receiving financial compensation can help survivors pay for years of therapy, medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages—including emotional distress—that are a direct result of the abuse. The average settlement payout in sexual abuse lawsuits against the LDS Church is estimated to range from $400,000 to $1.1 million, with serious cases potentially resulting in settlements in the millions.
In 2021, the LDS Church was involved in a legal dispute with its insurance companies over reimbursement for settlement payments made in sexual abuse cases, highlighting the financial implications of these lawsuits. However, for many, the greatest victory is the validation of their experience and the knowledge that they are helping to ensure no one else has to endure the same trauma.
Healing and Recovery for Abuse in the LDS Church
Recovering from sexual abuse is a deeply personal and often lifelong journey, especially for those whose abuse occurred within a religious institution like the LDS Church. Survivors of sexual abuse in the church may struggle with feelings of betrayal, isolation, and spiritual conflict, as the very community that was meant to offer support and guidance became a source of trauma. The process of healing can be further complicated by the church’s teachings, community expectations, and the way abuse allegations have historically been handled.
For many survivors, access to trauma-informed counseling, support groups, and legal advocacy is essential. These resources can help individuals process their experiences, rebuild trust, and regain a sense of control over their lives. It is also crucial for the LDS Church, as a religious institution, to acknowledge past failures, offer genuine support to survivors, and implement meaningful reforms. By fostering an environment of empathy, transparency, and accountability, the church can play a vital role in helping survivors heal and move forward. Ultimately, healing and recovery are possible when survivors are believed, supported, and empowered to seek justice on their own terms.
Prevention and Education About LDS Sexual Abuse
Preventing child sexual abuse and sexual abuse within the LDS Church requires a proactive and comprehensive approach. Church leaders, members, and the broader faith community must work together to create a culture where abuse allegations are taken seriously and every member feels safe. This begins with education—providing training for leaders and members on how to recognize the signs of abuse, understand the importance of reporting, and respond appropriately when abuse is suspected or disclosed.
The LDS Church, like other religious institutions, must regularly review and strengthen its policies and procedures for handling abuse allegations. This includes ensuring that all reports of child sexual abuse and sexual abuse are promptly reported to law enforcement, rather than handled solely within the church. By fostering open communication, supporting survivors, and holding perpetrators accountable, the church can help prevent future abuse and restore trust within its community.
Prioritizing prevention and education is not only a legal and ethical responsibility for the LDS Church, but also a reflection of its commitment to the teachings of Jesus Christ and the well-being of all its members.
What is the difference between a civil case and a criminal case for sexual abuse?
- A criminal case is brought by the government (through a prosecutor) to punish an individual for a crime, with penalties like jail time.
- A civil case is a lawsuit filed by an individual (the plaintiff) against a person or institution (the defendant) to seek financial compensation for the harm they suffered.
You can pursue a civil lawsuit against an abuser and the institution that enabled them, regardless of whether prosecutors filed a criminal case.
Contact Dolman Law Group To File An LDS Sexual Abuse Lawsuit
If you or your child experienced sexual abuse connected to the LDS Church, you don’t have to navigate this alone. We are here to help!
Please know that your courage in acknowledging what happened is immense, and you have every right to seek justice. You are not alone, and the patterns of abuse you may have experienced or observed are being brought to light by others through LDS church lawsuit actions.
Understanding your legal options, especially considering the complexities of state-specific look-back laws and institutional accountability, is crucial. Dolman Law Group is dedicated to assisting survivors of institutional church sexual abuse and negligence. Our experienced Mormon Church sexual abuse lawyers and legal advocates offer legal help and compassionate representation, fighting tirelessly to hold responsible parties accountable and pursue the justice and compensation you deserve.
For personalized advice regarding your experience and to learn how the evolving laws apply to your unique situation, contact Dolman Law Group for a free and confidential consultation. Call us at 833-552-7274 or complete our confidential contact form today. We are here to support you in your pursuit of healing and justice.
Frequently Asked Questions About LDS Church Lawsuits
Many institutions use non-disclosure agreements to silence survivors. However, depending on the state and the circumstances under which you signed it, an NDA may not be enforceable, especially in sexual abuse cases or cases involving crimes against a child. NDAs generally cannot prevent legal action in sexual abuse cases.
An attorney can review the document and advise you whether it prevents you from pursuing a legal claim.
Every case is unique, but evidence can include your own testimony, journals or diaries from the time of the abuse, letters, emails, and testimony from family members, friends, or therapists you confided in. Testimony or records involving a former LDS bishop may also be relevant, especially in cases where sexual abuse occurred and church leaders were involved or informed.
Documents from the church itself, such as records of transfers or internal complaints, can also become powerful evidence an attorney can obtain during the legal process.
For example, in March 2018, a recording was released in which Joseph Bishop, a former LDS Church mission president, was accused of sexually abusing McKenna Denson in 1984, leading to a civil lawsuit that was later dismissed in December 2020 at the request of both parties.
Additionally, Michael Jensen, an LDS member, was convicted in 2013 of sexually abusing two children while serving as a missionary and is currently serving a prison sentence of 35 to 75 years.
This is a common and valid concern. In many sexual abuse cases, courts allow sexual abuse victims to file lawsuits using a pseudonym, such as “Jane Doe” or “John Doe,” to protect their privacy. Your attorney will take every available measure to shield your identity throughout the legal process.
Our law firm, like most law firms representing abuse survivors, handles these cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no upfront fees. We only receive a fee if we successfully recover compensation for you through a settlement or a court award. If you do not win your case, you owe us nothing for our legal services.
- A criminal case is brought by the government (through a prosecutor) to punish an individual for a crime, such as sexual assault or child sex abuse, with penalties like jail time.
- A civil case is a lawsuit filed by an individual (the plaintiff) against a person or institution (the defendant) to seek financial compensation for the harm they suffered, including damages related to sexual assault or child sex abuse.
You can pursue a civil lawsuit against an abuser and the institution that enabled them, regardless of whether prosecutors filed a criminal case.