CLIENT SUCCESS STORIES

Testimonials

Results We Get – Case Studies

Traumatic Brain Injury

$2,250,000

Physical assault due to negligent security at an apartment complex resulting in a traumatic brain injury

Wrongful Death

$6,703,000

Wrongful Death

Auto Accident

$1,580,000.00

Auto AccidentResulting In Two Herniated Discs Impinging On The Spinal Cord

DISCLAIMER: These case results do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

VIEW MORE CASE STUDIES →

Meet Our Attorneys

Matt and his team of award-winning trial attorneys have secured over $700 million in combined verdicts and settlements for injured victims, including those harmed by negligence and corporate misconduct. Matt has personally handled thousands of mass tort cases. We don’t back down from large manufacturers — and we work tirelessly to recover fair compensation for injured families.

Matthew Dolman

Founding Partner

Stanley Gipe

Managing Partner

Rebecca Dolman

Founding Partner

Julia Dolman

Senior Attorney

Frequently Asked Questions

A product liability claim may be possible if a serious eye injury occurred after using Clear Eyes Maximum Itchy Eye Relief from Lot 2552A. The recall is an important piece of evidence, but it does not automatically prove the product caused the injury. An attorney can review the specific circumstances and determine whether a viable claim exists.

The recalled product is Clear Eyes Maximum Itchy Eye Relief, 0.5 fl oz, from Lot 2552A, with an expiration date of 09/30/2027. Both the lot number and expiration date must match. Having the same brand and bottle size is not enough. Check the label carefully before assuming the product is or is not affected.

Stop using the bottle immediately and set it aside with its packaging and any proof of purchase. Do not discard anything. If eye symptoms develop or worsen, see a doctor promptly and mention that a recalled product was used. Write down a timeline of events while the details are still fresh.

New or worsening symptoms are the key concern, not symptoms that existed before using the product. Significant eye pain, discharge, vision changes, light sensitivity, increased tearing, or swelling around the eye that appears or worsens after using the drops warrants prompt medical attention.

No. At this time, the FDA has not identified a specific contaminant in Lot 2552A. The recall was initiated because sterility could not be assured, not because a specific organism or substance was confirmed. That information may emerge as the investigation continues.

Prestige Brands Holdings initiated the recall and is identified as the recalling firm. The product label identifies Medtech Products Inc., a Prestige Consumer Healthcare company, as the distributor. Any investigation into a potential claim would need to examine every company involved in manufacturing, filling, testing, and distributing the affected product.

Serious, medically documented eye injuries are the focus. A significant eye infection, corneal damage, vision impairment, or other injury requiring medical treatment and supported by medical records would be the foundation of a potential claim. A mild, self-resolving irritation is unlikely to meet the threshold for a viable product liability case.

No. There is currently no class action lawsuit or mult-idistrict litigation involving the Clear Eyes recall. Individual claims can be investigated and pursued independently. Filing deadlines under state law apply regardless of whether coordinated litigation eventually develops, so waiting for a class action is not advisable.

Discarding the bottle does not automatically prevent a potential claim. Purchase records, pharmacy histories, online order confirmations, photographs, and medical records may all help establish what product was used and what harm resulted. An attorney can help identify what evidence may still be available.

Call Dolman Law Group for a free, confidential consultation. No records or documentation are required before calling. Our legal team will review what happened, assess the available evidence, and provide an honest assessment of whether you have a product liability claim worth pursuing.

dolman law group sex abuse lawyers